Foot-and-Mouth Disease Banner

FMD

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) is a highly contagious, single-stranded RNA viral infection caused by an Aphthovirus of the Picornaviridae family that inflicts severe economic and agricultural losses globally by primarily targeting cloven-hoofed domestic and wild animalsβ€”such as cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and deer. The disease spreads rapidly through direct contact with infected bodily secretions, contaminated inanimate objects via indirect contact, and airborne transmission over considerable distances depending on meteorological conditions. Following an incubation period typically ranging from 2 to 14 days, the virus causes widespread outbreaks that remain endemic across vast regions of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, whereas strict quarantine and biosecurity measures allow regions like North America, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, and much of Europe to maintain official FMD-free status (World Organisation for Animal Health, 2023; Alexandersen et al., 2003).

Cattle livestock
FMD

Foot-and-Mouth Disease

A highly contagious livestock disease

🦠

Disease Overview

Understanding FMD

Foot-and-Mouth Disease is one of the most contagious viral diseases affecting livestock. Because the virus can spread rapidly, an outbreak can have a significant impact on animal health, farm productivity and livestock trade.

Key Point

Early recognition and rapid disease-control measures are important because FMD can spread quickly among susceptible animals.

Disease Intelligence

Explore the Key Questions

Select a question below to explore detailed information about the disease.

Livestock

Clinical Signs

Recognizing FMD Symptoms

Signs & Symptoms

What should you look for?

βœ“Fever
βœ“Excessive salivation
βœ“Mouth blisters
βœ“Foot lesions
βœ“Lameness
βœ“Reduced appetite
βœ“Reduced milk production
βœ“Severe disease in young animals

FMD Timeline

Follow the typical progression of Foot-and-Mouth Disease β€” from initial exposure to rapid transmission.

Key Takeaway

FMD spreads extremely efficiently, primarily through infected animals, contaminated materials, and infectious aerosols. Unlike diseases that depend on a specific insect or animal vector, FMD is mainly transmitted through direct and indirect contact, with environmental conditions and livestock movements strongly influencing how quickly an outbreak expands.

Transmission & Vector Intelligence

Understand how FMD moves between animals and farms, which transmission routes matter most and how environmental and movement factors can increase risk.

↓

Lumpy Skin Disease Virus (LSDV) is transmitted predominantly by blood-feeding arthropods through mechanical transmission. Flies, mosquitoes and ticks can transfer virus-containing blood between infected and susceptible cattle.

βœ“Blood-feeding flies can mechanically transmit LSDV
βœ“Mosquitoes may contribute to virus transmission
βœ“Ticks may also contribute to transmission
βœ“Vector abundance and activity influence transmission opportunities
↓

Blood-feeding arthropods are the most important transmission drivers for LSD. Vectors can acquire LSDV-containing blood from infected cattle and mechanically transfer the virus during subsequent feeding.

βœ“Flies
βœ“Mosquitoes
βœ“Ticks
βœ“Mechanical transfer of virus-containing blood
↓

Environmental conditions can influence vector abundance and activity. Warm and humid conditions may favour vector activity and have been associated with increased LSD incidence in epidemiological studies.

βœ“Temperature can influence vector activity
βœ“Humidity can influence vector abundance and activity
βœ“Seasonal conditions can alter transmission opportunities
βœ“Environmental conditions can influence outbreak risk

Movement of infected cattle can transport LSDV into previously unaffected farms, markets and regions. Once introduced, local blood-feeding vectors can facilitate further transmission.

βœ“Infected cattle can carry LSDV to new locations
βœ“Transport can connect distant farms and regions
βœ“Livestock markets can increase exposure opportunities
βœ“Vector exposure after introduction can drive local transmission
⚠️

Transmission Risk

HOW DOES FMD SPREAD?

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) is highly contagious and can spread rapidly between susceptible livestock through direct contact, airborne transmission, contaminated materials, animal movement and the farm environment. Select a factor to explore it.

5 KEY RISK FACTORS
πŸ’‘

Key Intelligence

FMD transmission risk increases when infected animals, susceptible animals, contaminated materials and movement networks interact. Strong farm biosecurity, movement management and early detection are therefore central to reducing spread.

FMD Vaccine Intelligence

Understand why FMD vaccines can fail and how virus mismatch, waning immunity, cold-chain breaches, administration errors, antigenic variation and host or environmental factors can influence protection.

↓

FMD vaccines stimulate the animal's immune system to recognize relevant viral antigens and develop protective antibodies. Effective protection depends on an appropriate vaccine match, adequate immune response and correct vaccination practices.

βœ“Inactivated FMD virus antigens stimulate the immune system
βœ“Recognition of relevant viral antigens
βœ“Activation of B cells and T-cell responses
βœ“Production of FMDV-specific antibodies
βœ“Development of immunological memory
βœ“Protection depends on adequate antibody levels and vaccine matching
↓

FMD control programmes primarily use inactivated vaccines formulated against relevant FMD virus serotypes and strains. Because FMD has multiple serotypes and antigenically diverse viruses, vaccine selection must reflect the circulating field virus.

βœ“Inactivated FMD vaccines are commonly used
βœ“Vaccines may target specific FMD virus serotypes
βœ“Vaccine strains should be selected according to local epidemiology
βœ“Antigenic matching is important for effective protection
βœ“Booster schedules help maintain protective immunity

Protection depends on both the antigenic match between the vaccine and circulating field virus and the strength and duration of the animal's immune response.

βœ“Good antigenic match improves the likelihood of protection
βœ“Adequate antibody response is essential
βœ“Protective antibody levels can decline over time
βœ“Booster vaccination may be required to maintain immunity
βœ“Protection can vary according to animal and field conditions
⚠️

Vaccine Performance

WHY CAN VACCINE FAIL?

FMD vaccine performance can be affected by viral variation, declining immunity, cold-chain breaches, administration errors and host or environmental factors. Understanding these factors helps identify possible reasons for vaccine failure.

6 KEY FACTORS

Key Factors

Select a factor to explore its details.

πŸ’‘

Key Intelligence

FMD vaccine failure is usually multifactorial. Effective protection depends on an appropriate vaccine–field virus match, maintenance of protective immunity, strict 2Β°C–8Β°C cold-chain conditions, correct dosing and administration, appropriate vaccination timing, and consideration of host and environmental factors.

Vaccine Failure Case Studies

Explore representative field scenarios that show how vaccine matching, immunity, vaccine handling and viral pressure can influence FMD control.

Explore Case Studies

🌍

Part 08 β€’ Global Disease Surveillance

Global FMD Outbreaks

Explore the major Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) events that shaped modern prevention, control, vaccination and eradication strategies.

Surveillance dashboard

Global FMD situation overview

1 Active5 Resolved8 Events tracked

Global Disease Timeline

Major FMD Events

Key historical and recent FMD events that shaped modern disease surveillance, prevention, vaccination, movement control and outbreak-response strategies.

Explore Timeline

Surveillance Records

Regional PPR Events

8 records shown

🌍

Global Intelligence

What the Global FMD History Tells Us

FMD history demonstrates that animal movement, international trade, wildlife reservoirs, high-density livestock production, gaps in biosecurity and susceptible populations can drive transboundary spread. Sustained surveillance, vaccination, movement management, early detection, rapid response and coordinated international preparedness remain essential components of FMD control.

Global FMD News

Track the latest developments in FMD outbreaks, vaccines, policy and scientific research around the world.

Feed Status

Monitoring Active

Featured🦠

Outbreak

Global FMD Intelligence

🌍 TΓΌrkiyeβ€’24 Aug 2026
Latest Update24 Aug 2026

FMD surveillance highlights the importance of rapid outbreak response

Recent developments underline the importance of surveillance, early detection and coordinated disease-control measures.

🌍 TürkiyeOutbreaks

Latest

Latest Updates

6 Stories
🦠Outbreaks
🌍 TΓΌrkiyeβ€’24 Aug 2026

FMD surveillance highlights the importance of rapid outbreak response

Recent developments underline the importance of surveillance, early detection and coordinated disease-control measures.

FMD Intelligence
πŸ’‰Vaccines
🌍 Indiaβ€’22 Aug 2026

Vaccine matching remains central to FMD control strategies

Vaccine selection and antigenic matching continue to be important considerations in regional FMD vaccination programmes.

FMD Intelligence
🌍Policy
🌍 Globalβ€’20 Aug 2026

International coordination strengthens livestock disease preparedness

Cross-border coordination, surveillance and movement controls remain important tools for reducing transboundary disease risks.

FMD Intelligence
πŸ”¬Research
🌍 Globalβ€’18 Aug 2026

Researchers continue monitoring FMD virus evolution

Ongoing research focuses on virus evolution, antigenic characteristics and improving disease surveillance.

FMD Intelligence
⚠️Outbreaks
🌍 Middle Eastβ€’16 Aug 2026

Regional FMD monitoring remains a priority

Veterinary authorities continue strengthening monitoring and reporting systems to identify emerging disease activity.

FMD Intelligence
🧬Vaccines
🌍 Africaβ€’14 Aug 2026

Vaccination programmes focus on improving population protection

Improving vaccination coverage and maintaining effective vaccination schedules remain key components of FMD control.

FMD Intelligence
ℹ️

Intelligence Feed

News content should be connected to verified veterinary authorities, international organisations, research institutions and trusted news sources. Dates, countries and outbreak information should be refreshed automatically when a live feed is connected.

FMD By The Numbers

Key facts and figures that explain how Foot-and-Mouth Disease spreads, affects animals and creates global livestock risks.

⚑
01
Rapid

Transmission

FMD spreads quickly between susceptible livestock and can move rapidly through direct and indirect transmission routes.

⏱️
02
2–14days

Incubation Period

The incubation period is typically 2–14 days, depending on the virus strain, exposure dose and host.

🦠
03
7serotypes

Serotypes

FMD virus has seven recognised serotypes: O, A, C, Asia 1, SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3.

πŸ„
04
Multiple

Hosts

FMD affects cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, buffalo and other susceptible cloven-hoofed animals.

πŸ“ˆ
05
Up to 100%

Morbidity

In highly susceptible populations, most exposed animals may become infected, with morbidity reaching up to 100%.

πŸ”„

Transmission

How quickly can FMD move?

FMD is highly contagious and can spread rapidly between susceptible livestock through direct contact and contaminated materials. Major routes include livestock movement, animal products, people, vehicles, equipment and other contaminated materials.

πŸ„

Infected Animal

πŸ’§

Virus & Secretions

🚚

Movement

🚜

Equipment & Vehicles

πŸ‘₯

People

🧰

Contaminated Materials

πŸ„

Susceptible Host

Economic & Farm Impact

Why FMD matters

πŸ“Š
πŸ„

Animal productivity

FMD can cause significant reductions in milk and meat production.

πŸ’€

Animal deaths

Deaths may occur, particularly in young animals affected by severe cardiac damage.

🚫

Movement restrictions

Livestock movement may be restricted during outbreaks to reduce disease transmission.

πŸ’°

Control costs

Disease-control measures, surveillance and outbreak response can substantially increase costs.

🌍

Trade restrictions

FMD outbreaks can have major consequences for international livestock and animal-product trade.

Virus Diversity

The 7 FMD Serotypes

FMD virus consists of seven immunologically distinct serotypes. Immunity to one serotype does not necessarily provide protection against another.

O β€’ A β€’ C β€’ Asia 1 β€’ SAT 1 β€’ SAT 2 β€’ SAT 3
OFMD

One of the most widely reported FMD serotypes.

AFMD

Important serotype requiring appropriate vaccine matching.

CFMD

One of the seven recognised FMD serotypes.

Asia 1FMD

Historically important across parts of Asia and surrounding regions.

SAT 1FMD

Southern African Territories serotype.

SAT 2FMD

Southern African Territories serotype.

SAT 3FMD

Southern African Territories serotype.

O

Serotype O

One of the seven recognised FMD serotypes and widely reported in different regions.

A

Serotype A

An important FMD serotype requiring appropriate antigenic matching for vaccination.

C

Serotype C

One of the seven recognised FMD serotypes.

AS

Asia 1

A recognised FMD serotype historically associated with parts of Asia and surrounding regions.

SAT1

SAT 1

Southern African Territories serotype associated primarily with regions of Africa.

SAT2

SAT 2

Southern African Territories serotype associated primarily with regions of Africa.

SAT3

SAT 3

Southern African Territories serotype associated primarily with regions of Africa.

⚑

Rapid transmission

FMD can spread quickly between susceptible livestock, making early detection and rapid control measures essential.

🧬

Seven serotypes

FMD has seven recognised serotypes, and immunity to one serotype does not necessarily protect against another.

🌍

Global livestock risk

FMD affects multiple cloven-hoofed hosts and remains an important livestock disease across parts of Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

πŸ’°

Major economic impact

FMD can cause production losses, animal deaths, control costs, movement restrictions and trade disruption.

πŸ”¬

Early detection matters

Rapid diagnosis and reporting are critical for effective containment and outbreak response.

πŸ’‰

Vaccination is important

Vaccination is a key tool for reducing transmission and protecting susceptible livestock when appropriately matched to circulating virus strains.

ℹ️

Numerical ranges shown here are intended as general disease-intelligence indicators. Exact transmission, incubation, morbidity, mortality and host susceptibility can vary by virus strain, animal species, exposure dose, exposure route and epidemiological conditions.

Research & Evidence

Explore scientific literature, international surveillance, technical reports and research evidence related to Foot-and-Mouth Disease.

πŸ”¬

Evidence Base

Research β€’ Surveillance β€’ Reports

πŸ“„Scientific Papers
🌍WOAH
🌾FAO
πŸ”¬Research
πŸ“ŠReports
01
πŸ“š

Scientific Literature

Peer-reviewed FMD research provides evidence on pathogenesis, diagnosis, virus shedding, transmission, airborne spread and host susceptibility.

02
🌍

International Surveillance

WOAH and FAO provide structured information on FMD outbreaks, epidemiology, serotypes, emerging risks and international disease-control activities.

03
πŸ“Š

Technical Reports

Technical assessments and control strategies translate surveillance findings into practical recommendations for prevention, preparedness and response.

WOAHHighWOAH
🌍

Foot-and-Mouth Disease

World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)

WOAH Disease Information

Provides authoritative information on FMD disease definition, susceptible hosts, serotypes, clinical signs, incubation, mortality, surveillance and official disease-free status.

🎯

Useful For

Disease definition β€’ Hosts β€’ Serotypes β€’ Clinical signs β€’ Incubation β€’ Mortality β€’ Surveillance β€’ Disease-free status

Current Disease InformationExplore
WOAHHighWOAH
🌍

Foot and Mouth Disease β€” Technical Disease Card

World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)

Technical Disease Card, Paris. 2025.

Technical reference covering FMD epidemiology, transmission, clinical signs, diagnosis, prevention and disease-control measures.

🎯

Useful For

Epidemiology β€’ Transmission β€’ Clinical signs β€’ Diagnosis β€’ Prevention β€’ Control

2025Explore
FAOHighFAO
🌾

Foot-and-Mouth Disease

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

FAO Animal Health

Provides information on the global FMD situation, emerging risks, surveillance activities and current FMD events.

🎯

Useful For

Global disease situation β€’ Emerging risks β€’ Surveillance β€’ Current FMD events

Current InformationExplore
FAO/EuFMDHighFAO
🌾

Global Situation of Foot-and-Mouth Disease

FAO/EuFMD β€” European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease

Global FMD Situation

Describes the global distribution of FMD, endemic regions, regional epidemiological pools and international approaches to disease control.

🎯

Useful For

Global distribution β€’ Endemic regions β€’ Epidemiological pools β€’ International control

Global SituationExplore
FAO/EuFMDHighFAO
🌾

Global FMD Control Strategy

FAO/EuFMD β€” European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease

Global FMD Control Strategy

Supports international coordination, regional control programmes and the Progressive Control Pathway for Foot-and-Mouth Disease.

🎯

Useful For

International coordination β€’ Regional control β€’ Progressive Control Pathway β€’ Disease management

Control StrategyExplore
FAOHighFAO
⚠️

Rapid Risk Assessment: Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype SAT1

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Rapid Risk Assessment: FMD Virus Serotype SAT1. Published 4 March 2026.

Assesses the recent emergence of FMD virus serotype SAT1, transboundary spread risks, contributing factors and preparedness recommendations.

🎯

Useful For

SAT1 emergence β€’ Transboundary spread β€’ Risk factors β€’ Preparedness β€’ Response

2026Explore
FAOHighFAO
πŸ›‘οΈ

FMD Serotype SAT1 Alert: Situation Update and Recommendations

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Situation Update and Recommendations for Prevention, Preparedness and Response in the Near East and West Eurasia. 2025.

Provides information on SAT1 emergence in the Near East and highlights vaccination, biosecurity and surveillance as important components of preparedness and response.

🎯

Useful For

SAT1 emergence β€’ Vaccination β€’ Biosecurity β€’ Surveillance β€’ Preparedness β€’ Response

2025Explore
Scientific LiteratureHighScientific Papers
πŸ”¬

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease

Alexandersen, S., Zhang, Z., Donaldson, A. I., & Garland, A. J. M.

Journal of Comparative Pathology, 129(1), 1–36. 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9975(03)00041-0

A detailed scientific review covering FMD pathogenesis, diagnosis, virus excretion, immune responses and the carrier state.

🎯

Useful For

Pathogenesis β€’ Diagnosis β€’ Virus excretion β€’ Immune response β€’ Carrier state

2003Explore
Scientific LiteratureHighScientific Papers
🦠

Studies of quantitative parameters of virus excretion and transmission in pigs and cattle experimentally infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus

Alexandersen, S., et al.

Journal of Comparative Pathology, 129(4), 268–282. 2003.

Experimental research examining quantitative virus excretion and transmission in experimentally infected pigs and cattle, including differences between host species.

🎯

Useful For

Host susceptibility β€’ Virus shedding β€’ Transmission β€’ Pigs β€’ Cattle β€’ Species differences

2003Explore
Scientific LiteratureHighScientific Papers
πŸ’¨

Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from Burnside Farm during the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom

Gloster, J., et al.

Veterinary Record, 152(17), 525–533. 2003.

DOI: 10.1136/vr.152.17.525

Research examining airborne transmission of FMDV during the 2001 UK epidemic and the influence of meteorological conditions on disease spread.

🎯

Useful For

Airborne transmission β€’ Aerosol spread β€’ Meteorological influences β€’ FMD epidemic

2003Explore
Scientific LiteratureHighScientific Papers
🌦️

The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom: epidemiological and meteorological case studies

Gloster, J., et al.

Veterinary Record, 156(25), 793–803. 2005.

Provides epidemiological and meteorological evidence relating to airborne transmission during the 2001 UK FMD epidemic.

🎯

Useful For

Epidemiology β€’ Meteorology β€’ Airborne transmission β€’ UK 2001 epidemic

2005Explore
Scientific LiteratureHighScientific Papers
πŸ’¨

Re-assessing the likelihood of airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease at the start of the 1967–1968 UK epidemic

Gloster, J., et al.

Epidemiology & Infection. 2006.

DOI: 10.1017/S0950268805004073

Reassesses the likelihood of long-distance airborne FMD transmission and examines the role of weather conditions in disease spread.

🎯

Useful For

Long-distance airborne spread β€’ Weather conditions β€’ Epidemiology β€’ FMD transmission

2006Explore

Evidence Framework

How to interpret FMD evidence

Different evidence sources answer different questions. Scientific studies help explain FMD biology and transmission mechanisms, while official surveillance and technical reports provide information about disease occurrence, emerging risks and control strategies.

01

Peer-reviewed research

Pathogenesis, diagnosis, virus shedding, transmission and airborne spread

02

WOAH surveillance

Disease status, outbreaks, hosts, serotypes and official international reporting

03

FAO / EuFMD evidence

Global disease situation, emerging risks, regional epidemiology and control strategies

04

Technical reports

Risk assessment, preparedness, prevention and practical disease-control recommendations

πŸ”¬

Evidence First

Reliable FMD intelligence should be based on traceable scientific publications, official surveillance records and authoritative technical assessments.

Peer-Reviewed Scientific Evidence

HIGH

Official WOAH / FAO Surveillance

HIGH

Technical Risk Assessments

HIGH

Field Reports

VARIABLE
ℹ️

Source Integrity

FMD evidence should be interpreted using the original scientific publication, official WOAH or FAO surveillance record, or technical report. Scientific evidence can support understanding of disease mechanisms and control, but individual study findings should not automatically be interpreted as a guarantee of vaccine, treatment or control effectiveness.